<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Engadget: too much of a good thing?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ryanblock.com/2007/04/engadget-too-much-of-a-good-thing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ryanblock.com/2007/04/engadget-too-much-of-a-good-thing/</link>
	<description>Editor and technology critic in the midst of founding a new content startup.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 23:50:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave Storm</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanblock.com/2007/04/engadget-too-much-of-a-good-thing/#comment-52999</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Storm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 23:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/archive/2007/04/engadget-too-much-of-a-good-thing/#comment-52999</guid>
		<description>I was initially overwhelmed with the Engadget feed as well, but using Google Reader i found a system that works for me. I quickly scan through a few times a day, starring the stuff that looks interesting/useful/relevant. During a break or when I get home from work I then take the time to read the starred items.

I agree that a custom feed configuration, perhaps based on tags or keyworks would be cool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was initially overwhelmed with the Engadget feed as well, but using Google Reader i found a system that works for me. I quickly scan through a few times a day, starring the stuff that looks interesting/useful/relevant. During a break or when I get home from work I then take the time to read the starred items.</p>
<p>I agree that a custom feed configuration, perhaps based on tags or keyworks would be cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How do you read your feeds? &#187; Ryan Block</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanblock.com/2007/04/engadget-too-much-of-a-good-thing/#comment-50357</link>
		<dc:creator>How do you read your feeds? &#187; Ryan Block</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 21:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/archive/2007/04/engadget-too-much-of-a-good-thing/#comment-50357</guid>
		<description>[...] frequent and unfortunate use of mark all as read, and a gradually shrinking OPML). Naturally, the irony isn&#8217;t lost on me; trust me, Engadget readers experiencing news overload have my complete sympathy. It&#8217;s not [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] frequent and unfortunate use of mark all as read, and a gradually shrinking OPML). Naturally, the irony isn&#8217;t lost on me; trust me, Engadget readers experiencing news overload have my complete sympathy. It&#8217;s not [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Kelly</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanblock.com/2007/04/engadget-too-much-of-a-good-thing/#comment-34008</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 16:33:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/archive/2007/04/engadget-too-much-of-a-good-thing/#comment-34008</guid>
		<description>I tried adding Engadget to my Technology feeds, but it was just too much. I also have problems keeping up with Google News feed, and dropped it as well. I hate having things in my reader that are unread, and I never get around to reading them all. I always tell myself I'll read them later in the afternoon or evening, but never do.

What you should do is have categories and allow people to subscribe to them. I want to hear about Apple things, robots, non-PDA cellphones, any article with the word "monkey" in it, and any breaking news. You need a page that users can use to craft a custom feed. I could do it with Yahoo Pipes I guess, but I'm far too lazy for it right now.

That said, Engadget really is a great site. I listen to the podcast, as it is a nice condensation of what is happening without having to sift through hundreds of posts. The only thing I can think of to make the podcast more entertaining would be a crossover between BOL and Engadget.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried adding Engadget to my Technology feeds, but it was just too much. I also have problems keeping up with Google News feed, and dropped it as well. I hate having things in my reader that are unread, and I never get around to reading them all. I always tell myself I&#8217;ll read them later in the afternoon or evening, but never do.</p>
<p>What you should do is have categories and allow people to subscribe to them. I want to hear about Apple things, robots, non-PDA cellphones, any article with the word &#8220;monkey&#8221; in it, and any breaking news. You need a page that users can use to craft a custom feed. I could do it with Yahoo Pipes I guess, but I&#8217;m far too lazy for it right now.</p>
<p>That said, Engadget really is a great site. I listen to the podcast, as it is a nice condensation of what is happening without having to sift through hundreds of posts. The only thing I can think of to make the podcast more entertaining would be a crossover between BOL and Engadget.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Block</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanblock.com/2007/04/engadget-too-much-of-a-good-thing/#comment-33889</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Block</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 05:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/archive/2007/04/engadget-too-much-of-a-good-thing/#comment-33889</guid>
		<description>You're absolutely right. Another fun bug! I wonder how many thousands of people this prevented from seeing the feed... very frustrating.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re absolutely right. Another fun bug! I wonder how many thousands of people this prevented from seeing the feed&#8230; very frustrating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joost Schuur</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanblock.com/2007/04/engadget-too-much-of-a-good-thing/#comment-33886</link>
		<dc:creator>Joost Schuur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 05:37:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/archive/2007/04/engadget-too-much-of-a-good-thing/#comment-33886</guid>
		<description>When I'm at http://www.engadget.com/tag/breaking+news/ and look at the source, I see:

...link rel="alternate" type="application/rss+xml" title="RSS 2.0" href="/rss.xml" /...

That resolves as www.engadget.com/rss.xml.

Seems to me if you want to auto-detect the tag specific feed, it should read href="rss.xml" to get the proper relative URL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I&#8217;m at <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/breaking+news/" rel="nofollow">http://www.engadget.com/tag/breaking+news/</a> and look at the source, I see:</p>
<p>&#8230;link rel=&#8221;alternate&#8221; type=&#8221;application/rss+xml&#8221; title=&#8221;RSS 2.0&#8243; href=&#8221;/rss.xml&#8221; /&#8230;</p>
<p>That resolves as <a href="http://www.engadget.com/rss.xml" rel="nofollow">http://www.engadget.com/rss.xml</a>.</p>
<p>Seems to me if you want to auto-detect the tag specific feed, it should read href=&#8221;rss.xml&#8221; to get the proper relative URL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Block</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanblock.com/2007/04/engadget-too-much-of-a-good-thing/#comment-33884</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Block</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 05:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/archive/2007/04/engadget-too-much-of-a-good-thing/#comment-33884</guid>
		<description>Joost, it should autodetect. It does in all my browsers, we have the code in the page:

&lt;head&gt;
	&lt;title&gt;Posts tagged Breaking+news at Engadget&lt;/title&gt;
	&lt;link rel="alternate" type="application/rss+xml" title="RSS 2.0" href="/rss.xml" /&gt;

Thanks for pointing that out in the feeds page though, I'll have to look into that tomorrow AM!&lt;/head&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joost, it should autodetect. It does in all my browsers, we have the code in the page:</p>
<p><head></p>
<link rel="alternate" type="application/rss+xml" title="RSS 2.0" href="/rss.xml" />
<p>Thanks for pointing that out in the feeds page though, I&#8217;ll have to look into that tomorrow AM!</head></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joost Schuur</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanblock.com/2007/04/engadget-too-much-of-a-good-thing/#comment-33883</link>
		<dc:creator>Joost Schuur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 05:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/archive/2007/04/engadget-too-much-of-a-good-thing/#comment-33883</guid>
		<description>Ryan: In Antoine's defense, the link box on the front page has no specific RSS icon for the breaking news feed, the breaking news feed page itself doesn't auto-discover that specific feed, and there's no info on http://www.engadget.com/feeds/ about the per-tag feeds either.

In fact, there are some placeholders or unparsed tags on the latter that just read '%Overview%' next to each category feed.

Good to know about tag feeds though, thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryan: In Antoine&#8217;s defense, the link box on the front page has no specific RSS icon for the breaking news feed, the breaking news feed page itself doesn&#8217;t auto-discover that specific feed, and there&#8217;s no info on <a href="http://www.engadget.com/feeds/" rel="nofollow">http://www.engadget.com/feeds/</a> about the per-tag feeds either.</p>
<p>In fact, there are some placeholders or unparsed tags on the latter that just read &#8216;%Overview%&#8217; next to each category feed.</p>
<p>Good to know about tag feeds though, thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Block</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanblock.com/2007/04/engadget-too-much-of-a-good-thing/#comment-33865</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Block</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 03:38:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/archive/2007/04/engadget-too-much-of-a-good-thing/#comment-33865</guid>
		<description>Antoine, we did announce it -- see the big box on the right that says "see what's new at Engadget"? It's been in there since last September.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Antoine, we did announce it &#8212; see the big box on the right that says &#8220;see what&#8217;s new at Engadget&#8221;? It&#8217;s been in there since last September.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antoine</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanblock.com/2007/04/engadget-too-much-of-a-good-thing/#comment-33860</link>
		<dc:creator>Antoine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 03:20:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/archive/2007/04/engadget-too-much-of-a-good-thing/#comment-33860</guid>
		<description>Good thing I went here reading your article. I didn't know about the "breaking news feed". I feel relieved ... Since like  2 or 3 weeks, I felt the same way and began to quit reading Engadget because of the quantity of the news.

Maybe you should make an annoucement on Engadget about the breaking news feed, I'm sure LOTS of people don't know about it !

Antoine</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good thing I went here reading your article. I didn&#8217;t know about the &#8220;breaking news feed&#8221;. I feel relieved &#8230; Since like  2 or 3 weeks, I felt the same way and began to quit reading Engadget because of the quantity of the news.</p>
<p>Maybe you should make an annoucement on Engadget about the breaking news feed, I&#8217;m sure LOTS of people don&#8217;t know about it !</p>
<p>Antoine</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Block</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanblock.com/2007/04/engadget-too-much-of-a-good-thing/#comment-33851</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Block</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 02:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/archive/2007/04/engadget-too-much-of-a-good-thing/#comment-33851</guid>
		<description>Joost, it's http://www.engadget.com/tag/breaking+news/rss.xml

You can do that with any Engadget tag. For instance:
http://www.engadget.com/tag/microsoft
http://www.engadget.com/tag/microsoft/rss.xml
http://www.engadget.com/tag/apple
http://www.engadget.com/tag/apple/rss.xml

Jeffrey: our crossposting method is generally characterized as "most important 10% of mobile / HD news" hits the front page. Occasionally we'll have stuff that isn't necessarily so super important, but that we feel people just definitely need to know about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joost, it&#8217;s <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/breaking+news/rss.xml" rel="nofollow">http://www.engadget.com/tag/breaking+news/rss.xml</a></p>
<p>You can do that with any Engadget tag. For instance:<br />
<a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/microsoft" rel="nofollow">http://www.engadget.com/tag/microsoft</a><br />
<a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/microsoft/rss.xml" rel="nofollow">http://www.engadget.com/tag/microsoft/rss.xml</a><br />
<a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/apple" rel="nofollow">http://www.engadget.com/tag/apple</a><br />
<a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/apple/rss.xml" rel="nofollow">http://www.engadget.com/tag/apple/rss.xml</a></p>
<p>Jeffrey: our crossposting method is generally characterized as &#8220;most important 10% of mobile / HD news&#8221; hits the front page. Occasionally we&#8217;ll have stuff that isn&#8217;t necessarily so super important, but that we feel people just definitely need to know about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Urban Strata</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanblock.com/2007/04/engadget-too-much-of-a-good-thing/#comment-33832</link>
		<dc:creator>Urban Strata</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 01:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/archive/2007/04/engadget-too-much-of-a-good-thing/#comment-33832</guid>
		<description>Count me as one who wants MORE Engadget, NOT LESS. If anything, I'm a bit confused about the cross-posting between Engadget and Engadget Mobile (I subscribe to both, but not sure why I do). All in all, I see Engadget as my go-to source for bleeding edge tech info, and if that requires 40 or 80 or 180 posts per day, so be it. You guys keep me ahead of the curve. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Count me as one who wants MORE Engadget, NOT LESS. If anything, I&#8217;m a bit confused about the cross-posting between Engadget and Engadget Mobile (I subscribe to both, but not sure why I do). All in all, I see Engadget as my go-to source for bleeding edge tech info, and if that requires 40 or 80 or 180 posts per day, so be it. You guys keep me ahead of the curve. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Titanas</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanblock.com/2007/04/engadget-too-much-of-a-good-thing/#comment-33818</link>
		<dc:creator>Titanas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 00:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/archive/2007/04/engadget-too-much-of-a-good-thing/#comment-33818</guid>
		<description>I agree with Rob La Gesse's idea for several different feeds depending on the content. Don't forget that at the moment we also get some cross posting between Engadget, Engadget Mobile and Engadget HD.

I'd also suggest MSNBC's feed feature with the Most Viewed stories.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Rob La Gesse&#8217;s idea for several different feeds depending on the content. Don&#8217;t forget that at the moment we also get some cross posting between Engadget, Engadget Mobile and Engadget HD.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d also suggest MSNBC&#8217;s feed feature with the Most Viewed stories.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joost Schuur</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanblock.com/2007/04/engadget-too-much-of-a-good-thing/#comment-33797</link>
		<dc:creator>Joost Schuur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2007 22:33:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/archive/2007/04/engadget-too-much-of-a-good-thing/#comment-33797</guid>
		<description>Ryan: I'm not seeing a feed for http://www.engadget.com/tag/breaking+news/. What's the URL?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryan: I&#8217;m not seeing a feed for <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/breaking+news/" rel="nofollow">http://www.engadget.com/tag/breaking+news/</a>. What&#8217;s the URL?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joost Schuur</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanblock.com/2007/04/engadget-too-much-of-a-good-thing/#comment-33793</link>
		<dc:creator>Joost Schuur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2007 22:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/archive/2007/04/engadget-too-much-of-a-good-thing/#comment-33793</guid>
		<description>I too unsubscribed longer ago. Partly because there were too many updates, but I realize I could probably create category feed subscriptions. The problem is, even within a given category, there's a bunch of coverage I'd end up not caring about.

The other big reason was I was getting jealous of all the cool new toys I'd read about that ever weren't out yet, weren't going to come out in the US, or I couldn't afford.

Perhaps if entries had a 'major/minor' rating and I could subscribe to only major updates (on a per category basis)? But one person's major is another person's minor, and you've got several people writing for Engadget with differing opinions.

I did just go back and subscribe to the Features and Announcements feeds, to dip my toes into the water again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too unsubscribed longer ago. Partly because there were too many updates, but I realize I could probably create category feed subscriptions. The problem is, even within a given category, there&#8217;s a bunch of coverage I&#8217;d end up not caring about.</p>
<p>The other big reason was I was getting jealous of all the cool new toys I&#8217;d read about that ever weren&#8217;t out yet, weren&#8217;t going to come out in the US, or I couldn&#8217;t afford.</p>
<p>Perhaps if entries had a &#8216;major/minor&#8217; rating and I could subscribe to only major updates (on a per category basis)? But one person&#8217;s major is another person&#8217;s minor, and you&#8217;ve got several people writing for Engadget with differing opinions.</p>
<p>I did just go back and subscribe to the Features and Announcements feeds, to dip my toes into the water again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Too Much" in RSS feeds? &#171; Late to the Party</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanblock.com/2007/04/engadget-too-much-of-a-good-thing/#comment-33755</link>
		<dc:creator>Too Much" in RSS feeds? &#171; Late to the Party</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2007 19:08:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/archive/2007/04/engadget-too-much-of-a-good-thing/#comment-33755</guid>
		<description>[...] too many updates, causing people to unsubscribe to their feed.&#160; This article was spurred by Ryan Block&#8217;s post on his personal blog asking, &#8220;Is Engadget&#8217;s daily wall-to-wall coverage too much of a good [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] too many updates, causing people to unsubscribe to their feed.&nbsp; This article was spurred by Ryan Block&#8217;s post on his personal blog asking, &#8220;Is Engadget&#8217;s daily wall-to-wall coverage too much of a good [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: modus</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanblock.com/2007/04/engadget-too-much-of-a-good-thing/#comment-33731</link>
		<dc:creator>modus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2007 17:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/archive/2007/04/engadget-too-much-of-a-good-thing/#comment-33731</guid>
		<description>I manage to keep up with engadget, but mostly because I've dumped alot of the other tech feeds I used to browse.  Not only do you guys hit most topics I care about, but the writing is actually far better than most.  (I won't name names, but the tone of the site that starts with "G" and ends with "izmodo" gets on my nerves).  

I don't know your back-end set up, but instead of trying to allow for custom feeds (which would rock but be complicated to implement) or just a breaking news "must have" feed, what about something along the lines of a small, medium and large feed?  

Kind of Geek: You have your breaking news/editor's choice feed for the big releases/reviews and major tech company chaos

Geek: Same as above, add in any product/software release (no announcements w/o release info) and breaking scientific discoveries

Binary Geek: Everything, from zero all the way to one - the rumors, the announcements without release info, the tech soap opera stories and yes, even the random USB crap

I don't know if this is really any easier of a system than being able to filter by tag to get a custom feed like Rob suggested, but if it is, it might make for a nice middle ground.

Any way you break it, I'll still keep you guys at the top of my feeds, and somehow, I'll manage to spend the 2 seconds deciding which stories to ignore.

Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I manage to keep up with engadget, but mostly because I&#8217;ve dumped alot of the other tech feeds I used to browse.  Not only do you guys hit most topics I care about, but the writing is actually far better than most.  (I won&#8217;t name names, but the tone of the site that starts with &#8220;G&#8221; and ends with &#8220;izmodo&#8221; gets on my nerves).  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know your back-end set up, but instead of trying to allow for custom feeds (which would rock but be complicated to implement) or just a breaking news &#8220;must have&#8221; feed, what about something along the lines of a small, medium and large feed?  </p>
<p>Kind of Geek: You have your breaking news/editor&#8217;s choice feed for the big releases/reviews and major tech company chaos</p>
<p>Geek: Same as above, add in any product/software release (no announcements w/o release info) and breaking scientific discoveries</p>
<p>Binary Geek: Everything, from zero all the way to one - the rumors, the announcements without release info, the tech soap opera stories and yes, even the random USB crap</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know if this is really any easier of a system than being able to filter by tag to get a custom feed like Rob suggested, but if it is, it might make for a nice middle ground.</p>
<p>Any way you break it, I&#8217;ll still keep you guys at the top of my feeds, and somehow, I&#8217;ll manage to spend the 2 seconds deciding which stories to ignore.</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanblock.com/2007/04/engadget-too-much-of-a-good-thing/#comment-33724</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2007 16:42:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/archive/2007/04/engadget-too-much-of-a-good-thing/#comment-33724</guid>
		<description>Id like to add my vote for a tag system on Engadget with RSS feeds for each tag (real broad though, like 'Gaming', 'Software', 'photography' etc).  I havent unsubscribed to Engadget but there is too much for me that is of little interest.  You guys do a great job of covering so much stuff that its hard for me to just find the posts I would be interested in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Id like to add my vote for a tag system on Engadget with RSS feeds for each tag (real broad though, like &#8216;Gaming&#8217;, &#8216;Software&#8217;, &#8216;photography&#8217; etc).  I havent unsubscribed to Engadget but there is too much for me that is of little interest.  You guys do a great job of covering so much stuff that its hard for me to just find the posts I would be interested in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Block</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanblock.com/2007/04/engadget-too-much-of-a-good-thing/#comment-33717</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Block</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2007 16:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/archive/2007/04/engadget-too-much-of-a-good-thing/#comment-33717</guid>
		<description>Rob -- come to think of it, I think I do remember seeing that post. Tag/catgory filters for showing the front page and feeds is definitely a good idea (and one we've toyed around with), but it could be extremely difficult to accomplish with our system. We're built to take a beating from literally millions of people at once, so we're very vertical, but not to horizontal. I'll def see what our techs think though.

Knots -- you must be thinking of the myriad other blogs that wrote about the USB humping dog. We didn't cover it.

James -- we do have something like a "must read Engadget feed", the breaking news feed. Check it out! As for the commented on feed, that's def an idea worth looking into.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rob &#8212; come to think of it, I think I do remember seeing that post. Tag/catgory filters for showing the front page and feeds is definitely a good idea (and one we&#8217;ve toyed around with), but it could be extremely difficult to accomplish with our system. We&#8217;re built to take a beating from literally millions of people at once, so we&#8217;re very vertical, but not to horizontal. I&#8217;ll def see what our techs think though.</p>
<p>Knots &#8212; you must be thinking of the myriad other blogs that wrote about the USB humping dog. We didn&#8217;t cover it.</p>
<p>James &#8212; we do have something like a &#8220;must read Engadget feed&#8221;, the breaking news feed. Check it out! As for the commented on feed, that&#8217;s def an idea worth looking into.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nima</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanblock.com/2007/04/engadget-too-much-of-a-good-thing/#comment-33711</link>
		<dc:creator>Nima</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2007 15:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/archive/2007/04/engadget-too-much-of-a-good-thing/#comment-33711</guid>
		<description>I also dropped Engadget's feed pretty quickly because of the overload. I think Rob's idea is great -- offer multiple, more specific feeds. You could also have an Editor's Pick feed, which covered only maybe the top five or so items of the day. I would definitely subscribe to that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also dropped Engadget&#8217;s feed pretty quickly because of the overload. I think Rob&#8217;s idea is great &#8212; offer multiple, more specific feeds. You could also have an Editor&#8217;s Pick feed, which covered only maybe the top five or so items of the day. I would definitely subscribe to that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jorge</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanblock.com/2007/04/engadget-too-much-of-a-good-thing/#comment-33706</link>
		<dc:creator>Jorge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2007 15:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ryanblock.com/archive/2007/04/engadget-too-much-of-a-good-thing/#comment-33706</guid>
		<description>After a long time, I deleted the feed a month ago, for the same reason here presented. I searched for a trimmed down, just the important things feed , but couln't find it, I didn't know which feed to subscribe to. I said: lets listen to the podcast only, that would be enough. I feel it isn't, but I couldn't carry the load of passing all the headlines and you making me to always have unrad items in my google reader.
I'll try the breaking news thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After a long time, I deleted the feed a month ago, for the same reason here presented. I searched for a trimmed down, just the important things feed , but couln&#8217;t find it, I didn&#8217;t know which feed to subscribe to. I said: lets listen to the podcast only, that would be enough. I feel it isn&#8217;t, but I couldn&#8217;t carry the load of passing all the headlines and you making me to always have unrad items in my google reader.<br />
I&#8217;ll try the breaking news thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
